Finding the Light…Source (and 3D Printed Film Holders)

Disclaimer: The following discussion about film holders, 3D printing, and light sources is all opinion and just my thoughts on a process that I barely know anything about. Don’t quote me…but if you do - link my page :)

After building my copy stand and selecting a macro lens, it was time to add two more critical pieces: a film holder and a light source. Rather than jumping straight into costly branded accessories, I decided to start with a DIY approach — 3D printing my own holder.

This post covers what worked, what didn’t, and what I learned after scanning my first negatives.

3D Printing My First Film Holders

For my first attempt, I used an open-source design from Thingiverse: 35mm Film Holder for Camera Scanning. I had the parts printed through Craftcloud, which allowed me to choose the material and finish without owning my own printer.

The design was lightweight, affordable, and modular — with the option to modify or replace individual parts later.

Why I Started with 3D Prints:

  • Much cheaper than commercial holders

  • Easy to prototype and test different designs

  • No specialized tools required

  • Plenty of free designs available online

The Holders

I printed all 35 and 120 options, the basic base, and the base with the advance rollers.

I wanted to love the advancing system, but it was more finicky than helpful.

The Reality

Once I started using the holder, a few challenges became clear:

  • Flatness was inconsistent — some film curled or bowed between supports. This will cause focus issues across the image.

  • Light leaks — it was difficult to keep light from entering through the sides of the holder.

  • Alignment required constant attention — I had to manually square each frame before scanning.

  • DUST collection — the plastic surface seemed to attract debris more than I expected.

  • Print quality — printing multiple variations wasn’t cost-friendly and the roughness (caused by the settings I chose) scratched the film.

  • Difficulty loading — the film entry point was restrictive and tricky to use, whether the lights were off or on.

Despite these issues, the experience was valuable. I learned quickly that a good film holder needs to be rigid, well-sealed against stray light, and easy to load while keeping film perfectly flat. Emphasis on easy to load.

Choosing a Light Source

I’ll be honest, I tried researching light requirements and quickly got overwhelmed by science. I chose the Daylight LED Light Pad, A4 Ultra-Thin — a slim, bright, and color-consistent panel designed for sketching and viewing negatives.

What I like about this light:

  • Bright, even illumination with minimal heat

  • Adjustable brightness levels for different film densities

  • Neutral daylight color temperature that reduces post-processing corrections

What I don’t like about this light:

  • It’s large. The size of the light pad dwarfs the film holder and causes tons of stray light to leak into the lens.

  • That’s it…honestly, it’s a good light source.

First Test Scans

With the 3D printed holder, new LED light pad, Nikon 55mm f/2.8 Micro-Nikkor, PK-13 extension tube, and Canon EOS M6 Mark II, I scanned a few frames from Kodak Gold and Ilford HP5.

What Went Well:

  • Sharpness — the lens delivered exceptional detail.

  • Exposure control — shooting in manual mode kept scans consistent.

  • RAW workflow — capturing in RAW gave me flexibility for adjustments.

What Didn’t:

  • Dust — static-prone surfaces and gaps in the holder made dust control a constant battle.

  • Frame alignment — small shifts slowed down the process.

  • Film loading — the pain of loading this film carrier truly bombarded my enjoyment of the process.

Even with the imperfections, seeing my first scans from a DIY setup was incredibly satisfying. The results weren’t perfect, but they were mine — and a clear step toward building a better system.

The process has changed a lot since these first few scans, so I won’t share any (…sorry), but there’s more to come!

What’s Next

In the next post, I’ll explain why I sold the Canon EOS M6 Mark II, the camera I replaced it with, and how switching gear mid-process forced me to rethink my setup.

See you in Post #4!

— Steven
Hollyridge Photography

Follow us on Instagram or Facebook. Check our Print Shop for prints and our Etsy Store for digital downloads.


Previous
Previous

Tom’s Thumb Trail Hike | McDowell Sonoran Preserve, Scottsdale AZ

Next
Next

Finding the Right Macro Lens for DSLR Film Scanning